Equalizer: Ozone's excellent EQ has a slight edge on the master bus, but Pro-Q (now Pro-Q2) beats it on individual tracks and submixes. I haven't used the new dynamic EQ in Ozone, but it looks a lot like Pro-MB, and Melda's UI is a lot easier to use than either of them. At any rate, these days I'll use Meldaproduction's MDynamicEQ rather than a multiband anyway, so neither Ozone nor FabFilter wins this round. Multi-band compressor: I haven't used Ozone's multiband compressor for a long time, but I like it better than Pro-MB despite the latter's beautiful UI. Even in projects where I'm using all FabFilter stuff on the master, there'll still be an instance of Ozone just for the exciter. Exciter: FabFilter's answer to Ozone's exciter module is Saturn, which is more versatile if you want severe distortion but isn't nearly as good as Ozone for more subtle applications. ![]() If had to choose one over the other, it'd be Pro-L, but not by much. Its Dynamic mode is awesome for drum busses. That's my choice for individual tracks and sub-busses, and for more aggressive and louder styles. Pro-L, OTOH, is capable of more clinical tweaking. Throw it on, quickly dial in a threshold while watching SPAN's K-14 meter and you're done. Limiter: I tend to use Ozone's limiter for the easy projects that don't call for a lot of master bus manipulation. FabFilter - I use both, but for different things.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |